Ultrawide vs Super Ultrawide: A Detailed Comparison
Table of Contents
Feature | Ultrawide (21:9) | Super Ultrawide (32:9) |
---|---|---|
Resolution | Typically 2560×1080 or 3440×1440 | Typically 3840×1080 or 5120×1440 |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 (wider than 16:9) | 32:9 (wider than 21:9, equivalent to two 16:9 screens) |
Screen Size | 29-34 inches | 49 inches or larger |
Field of View | Extra wide, great for gaming and multitasking | Extremely wide, offering immersive gaming and massive productivity space |
Gaming Experience | Immersive with wider viewing angles, perfect for FPS and racing games | Cinematic experience, best for games supporting ultrawide (rare but growing support) |
Productivity & Multitasking | Great for multitasking with multiple windows side-by-side | Ideal for extreme multitasking (editing, coding, data analysis) with no bezels |
Content Creation | Excellent for photo/video editing, designing, and music production | Exceptional for video editing and 3D modeling, offering large timeline and workspace |
Desk Space | Requires less desk space than super ultrawide | Requires larger desk space to accommodate the larger screen size |
Cost | Generally more affordable than super ultrawide | Higher price due to larger screen size and higher resolution |
Ideal Use Cases | Casual gaming, office work, content creation | Professional workstations, high-end gaming, creative professionals, data-intensive tasks |
Space Efficiency | More space-efficient, great for small desk setups | Requires a larger workspace due to the size of the display |
Gaming Compatibility | Supports most games in 21:9 aspect ratio | Best for games supporting 32:9, but many games require custom configurations |